Awstats vs webalizer download#
I still think web host should make server logs available for download or to analyze in the shell, and thus there is no reason you cant compare a web server log with tools like sed, grep, wc, to get a representation of how many non-JS visitors you have and use this calculate adjustment to present to advertisers if really want to go that route, but if Google Ads dont count non-JS visitors good luck getting publishers you've found yourself to fall for 'Our GA/MixPanel show 5. 2 In terms of market share, AWStats is clearly lagging behind, losing to Google Analytics in all segments. You can set Webalizer up to ignore certain spiders or robots, but maybe this isn’t worth doing as you can’t eliminate them all so why bother Like AWStats, Webalizer isn’t a marketing tool. 1 Google Analytics is leading in Top 10K Sites, Top 100K Sites, Top 1M Sites and The Entire Web. So more vists will be recorded due to this fact alone. will action the javascript, or fallback to 1x1 image. Webalizer sets a visit at 30 minutes duration, rather than AWStsts’ 60 minutes. As for non-JS fallback is it worth worrying about? And do any offer a 1x1 image fallback?īuilding meaningful stats from web server logs is difficult because often you're interested in visitors that aren't actually bots, i.e.
In domainname/stats the login fails, I don’t know why.
conf files located in /etc/awstats because I didn’t find nothing useful for my target in Virtualmin -> Features and Plugins -> AWstats -> Configure option.
Or run a dedicated appliance which does the same thing. OK about AWstats, but I can change the location of the three folders in. Most modern web sites have long moved away from using web server logs as the source for web analytics (cpanel hosted sites obviously exempt, it will probably still be awstats, insecure FTP and horrid web mail in 2015) and instead prefer to opt-in to a 3rd party service such as mixpanel, clicky, google analytics (as you mention), kiss metrics etc.
0 kommentar(er)
